4.4 Article

Nearly a third of abnormalities found after first-trimester screening are different than expected:10-year experience from a single center

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 251-256

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4054

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective This study aimed to assess the efficacy of first-trimester aneuploidy screening in a single clinical setting. Methods Maternal age, nuchal translucency, and maternal serum levels of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free beta human chorionic gonadotrophin comprised first-trimester risk assessment for Down syndrome and trisomies 13/18. Means, screen positive rates, detection rates, and predictive values were calculated for Down syndrome and trisomies 13/18. Results Of the 23329 first-trimester screenings, 6.3% were screen positive: 5.7% for Down syndrome only, 0.4% for trisomies 13/18 only, and 0.3% for Down syndrome and trisomies 13/18. An abnormal karyotype was present in 3.9% of screen positives for Down syndrome, 13.8% of screen positives for trisomies 13/18, and 45.9% of screen positives for both Down syndrome and trisomies 13/18. Of the 97 pregnancies found to have an abnormal karyotype, 29.9% had chromosome abnormalities other than trisomy 13, 18, or 21, with expected clinical outcomes ranging from likely benign to uniformly lethal. Conclusion As expected, first-trimester screening is effective for detecting aneuploidy for chromosomes 13, 18, and 21; however, a significant number of chromosomally abnormal pregnancies initially identified by first-trimester screening have a different karyotype. With the possible exception of 47,XYY and 45,X, the dataset suggested that these different chromosome complements were likely to be randomly distributed. Nevertheless, prior to diagnostic testing, prospective parents should be counseled concerning the possibility of a chromosome abnormality other than the trisomies 13, 18, or 21. (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available