4.4 Article

Diagnostic yield by supplementing prenatal metaphase karyotyping with MLPA for microdeletion syndromes and subtelomere imbalances

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 995-999

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2604

Keywords

prenatal diagnosis: subtelomere imbalance; MLPA; microdeletion syndrome; translocation; fetal malformation; chorionic villus sampling; ammocentesis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The aim of the study was to retrospectively assess the relevance of using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) for detection of selected microdeletion syndromes (22q11, Prader-Wilh/Angelman, Miller-Dieker, Smith-Magenis, Ip-, Williams), the reciprocal microduplication syndromes and imbalance at the subtelomere regions of chromosomes in a routine prenatal setting Method A total of 530 prenatal samples wet e analysed by commercial MLPA kits (SALSA P064. P036 and P069) in addition to rapid aneuploidy testing and G-band karyotyping Results Among the prenatal samples with a normal metaphase karyotype, nine submicroscopic imbalances were detected. seven 22q11 deletions (Velocardiofacial/DiGeorge syndrome), one 15q11 deletion (Prader-Willi syndrome) and one terminal deletion of the short arm of chromosome 4 (Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome). All imbalances were found in amniocentesis (AC) taken due to fetal structural malformation and/or other ultrasound scan (US) detected abnormality. The diagnostic yield was 4 1% in the subgroup with structural malformation and 1 6% in the subgroup with other US abnormality Conclusion The data set substantiates that additional MLPA analyses for selected microdeletions and subtelomere imbalances ate valuable in routine prenatal diagnostics. when a malformation(s) and/or other abnormalities are detected by US In contrast. the additional MLPA analyses gave no diagnostic yield in case of increased nuchal translucency (NT) Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available