Journal
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 789-795Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2053
Keywords
array CGH; chromosome abnormality; dysmorphic features; malformation; copy number variant
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective To compare the detection rate by microarray analysis for chromosome abnormalities in a prenatal Population to that of a neonatal population referred for diagnostic testing. Methods Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis was performed for 151 prenatal cases and compared with the results from 1375 postnatal cases less than 3 months of age. Results Two of 15 1 prenatal cases (1.3%) showed a clinically significant cytogenetic abnormality. In contrast, of the 1375 postnatal cases studied, 11.4% showed a cytogenetic abnormality by aCGH. Many of these (40%) were referred for aCGH because of dysmorphic features, a clinical indication unlikely to be identified ill the prenatal population. Conclusions The chance of detecting a chromosome abnormality in a prenatal Population that has already been screened by routine cytogenetics is similar to 1.3%. However, given that many of the abnormal array results in the neonatal population were among those with dysmorphic features as the primary indication for testing, which are not easily identifiable by ultrasound, offering prenatal testing by aCGH to a wider population would likely result in it higher detection rate. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available