Adaptive Monte Carlo and GUM methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty of cylindricity error

Measurement uncertainty is one of the most important concepts in geometrical product specification (GPS). The Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM) is the internationally accepted master document for the evaluation of uncertainty. The GUM method (GUMM) requires the use of a first-order Taylor series expansion for propagating uncertainties. However, when the mathematical model of measurand is strongly non-linear the use of this linear approximation may be inadequate. Supplement! to GUM (GUM S1) has recently been proposed based on the basis of probability density functions (PDFs) using the Monte Carlo method (MCM). In order to solve the problem that the number of Monte Carlo trials needs to be selected priori, adaptive Monte Carlo method (AMCM) described in GUM Si is recommended to control over the quality of the numerical results provided by MCM. The measurement and evaluation of cylindricity errors are essential to ensure proper assembly and good performance. In this paper, the mathematical model of cylindricity error based on the minimum zone condition is established and a quasi particle swarm optimization algorithm (QPSO) is proposed for searching the cylindricity error. Because the model is non-linear, it is necessary to verify whether GUMM is valid for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty of cylindricity error. Then, AMCM and GUMM are developed to estimate the uncertainty. The procedure of AMCM scheme and the validation of GUMM using AMCM are given in detail. Practical example is illustrated and the result shows that GUMM is not completely valid for high-precision evaluation of the measurement uncertainty of cylindricity error if only the first-order terms in the Taylor series approximation are taken into account. Compared with conventional methods, not only the proposed QPSO method can search the minimum zone cylindricity error precisely and rapidly, but also the Monte Carlo simulation is adaptive and AMCM can provide control variables (i.e. expected value, standard uncertainty and lower and higher coverage interval endpoints) with an expected numerical tolerance. The methods can be extended to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty of other form errors such as roundness and sphericity errors. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.