4.6 Article

Development and validation of fuzzy logic inference to determine optimum rates of N for corn on the basis of field and crop features

Journal

PRECISION AGRICULTURE
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 621-635

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11119-010-9188-z

Keywords

Precision farming; Variable-rate technology; Fuzzy inference systems; Topography; Apparent electrical conductivity (ECa); Nitrogen sufficiency index (NSI)

Funding

  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A fuzzy inference system (FIS) was developed to generate recommendations for spatially variable applications of N fertilizer. Key soil and plant properties were identified based on experiments with rates ranging from 0 to 250 kg N ha(-1) conducted over three seasons (2005, 2006 and 2007) on fields with contrasting apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa), elevation (ELE) and slope (SLP) features. Mid-season growth was assessed from remotely sensed imagery at 1-m(2) resolution. Optimization of N rate by the FIS was defined against maximum corn growth in the weeks following in-season N application. The best mid-season growth was in areas of low ECa, high ELE and low SLP. Under favourable soil conditions, maximum mid-season growth was obtained with low in-season N. Responses to N fertilizer application were better where soil conditions were naturally unfavourable to growth. The N sufficiency index (NSI) was used to judge plant N status just prior to in-season N application. Expert knowledge was formalized as a set of rules involving ECa, ELE, SLP and NSI levels to deliver economically optimal N rates (EONRs). The resulting FIS was tested on an independent set of data (2008). A simulation revealed that using the FIS would have led to an average N saving of 41 kg N ha(-1) compared to the recommended uniform rate of 170 kg N ha(-1), without a loss of yield. The FIS therefore appears to be useful for incorporating expert knowledge into spatially variable N recommendations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available