4.6 Article

A remote irrigation monitoring and control system (RIMCS) for continuous move systems. Part B: field testing and results

Journal

PRECISION AGRICULTURE
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 11-26

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11119-009-9110-8

Keywords

Precision irrigation; Variable rate application; Wireless control; System evaluation

Funding

  1. USDA-ARS-NPARL
  2. WSU Center for Precision Agricultural Systems (CPAS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precision irrigation systems can have inherent errors that affect the accuracy of variable water application rates controllers, as well as affect the controllers' performance when evaluated on different continuous move irrigation systems configurations. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of a remote irrigation monitoring and control system (RIMCS) installed on two separate linear move (LM) irrigation systems. The RIMCS varies water application rates by pulsing nozzles controlled by solenoids connected via relays to a single board computer (SBC) with wireless Ethernet connection to a remote server. The system also monitors irrigation system flow, pressure, position and wireless field sensor networks. The system was installed on a LM irrigation system in Prosser, Washington, USA and on a LM in the Nesson Valley of North Dakota, USA. For the LM at Prosser, four pre-defined irrigation patterns were imposed and variable rates were applied as a percentage of the nozzle base application rate. Each nozzle was pulsed across the span length and along the LM travel direction. For the LM at the Nesson Valley, a quadratic pattern was imposed pulsing banks of nozzles along the LM travel direction. Standard catch can tests were performed and the system performance was evaluated by comparing measured catch can water depths with pre-determined target values. The RIMCS accuracy was found to be in the range of the LM uniform water depth application uniformity coefficients of 88-96%. The RIMCS was successfully transferred to another LM in North Dakota as indicated by the relatively low variable rate application errors of -8.8 +/- A 8.1% and -0.14 +/- A 6.7% for the two spans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available