4.5 Article

Middle Neoarchean magmatism in western Shandong, North China Craton: SHRIMP zircon dating and LA-ICP-MS Hf isotope analysis

Journal

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages 865-884

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2014.07.016

Keywords

Neoarchean; Granitoids; SHRIMP zircon dating; Hf-in-zircon isotopes; Shandong Province; North China Craton

Funding

  1. Major State Basic Research Program of the People's Republic of China [2012CB416600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40672127]
  3. Key Program of the Ministry of Land and Resources of China [12120114021301, 12120113013700, 1212010811033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Western Shandong Province is a typical area of the North China Craton (NCC) where Neoarchean plutonic and supracrustal rocks are widely distributed. Early studies documented that similar to 2.7 Ga and similar to 2.5 Ga magmato-tectono-thermal events are well developed in the area. Here we report SHRIMP U-Pb ages and Hf-in-zircon isotopic data from ten samples of different magmatic rock types including hornblendite, gneissic tonalite, gneissic trondhjemite and gneissic granite. Magmatic zircon grains have (207)pb/(206)pb ages ranging from 2667 to 2598 Ma. Some rocks contain similar to 2.5 Ga metamorphic rims and similar to 2.7 Ga zircon cores. The magmatic zircon grains have epsilon(Hf)(t) values and Hf crustal model ages of -1.1 to +11.3 and 3.02-2.4 Ga, respectively. Combined with an earlier study, our main conclusions are that the middle Neoarchean rocks mainly occur together with early Neoarchean rocks in the northeastern portion of the central belt. Juvenile additions to continental crust and crustal recycling played important roles in the middle Neoarchean of western Shandong Province, and the entire Neoarchean tectonic evolution can be divided into middle to early Neoarchean (2.75-2.6 Ga) and late Neoarchean (2.6-2.5 Ga) events. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available