4.5 Article

The making of Gondwana: Discovery of 650 Ma HP granulites from the North Lhasa, Tibet

Journal

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
Volume 212, Issue -, Pages 107-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.04.018

Keywords

Neoproterozoic HP granulite; Petrology; Geochronology; Metamorphism; Gondwana assembly; Lhasa terrane; Tibet

Funding

  1. Geological Survey Project of Geological Survey of China [1212010918012]
  2. National Natural Science Fund Projects [40921001, 40772049, 40972055]
  3. Foundation for Open Projects of State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences [GPMR200907]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Lhasa terrane has been traditionally considered as the northern boundary of the Indian continent. Here we report the discovery of high-pressure granulites occurring as blocks within the Paleozoic sedimentary rocks of the North Lhasa terrane. The mafic HP granulite is composed of garnet, clinopyroxene, plagioclase, rutile and quartz, whereas the pelitic HP granulite has an assemblage of garnet, kyanite, biotite, muscovite, plagioclase and quartz. The mafic rocks show whole-rock compositional features of MORB. Our thermobarometric computations yield P-T conditions of ca. 1.7-1.8 GPa and 690-730 degrees C, corresponding to metamorphism under eclogite-facies, with a peak metamorphic gradient of similar to 14 degrees C/km, typical of collision-zone metamorphism. In situ zircon U-Pb dating places the timing of the early HP metamorphism at ca. 650 Ma, with the late amphibolite-facies retrogression lasting up to ca. 480 Ma. Our study reports the first evidence for Late Neoproterozoic HP metamorphism from Tibet, suggesting that the North Lhasa terrane might have been derived from the northern segment of the East African Orogen formed during the assembly of crustal blocks within the Eastern and Western Gondwana. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available