4.5 Article

Grenville-age orogenesis in the Qaidam-Qilian block: The link between South China and Tarim

Journal

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
Volume 220, Issue -, Pages 9-22

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.07.007

Keywords

North Qaidam UHPM belt; Grenville-age; Orogeny; Geochronology; South-West China United Continent

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40825007, 40821002, 40773012]
  2. Major State Basic Research Development Projects [2009CB825007]
  3. Basic geological survey program of China Geological Survey [1212011121258]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The link between the South China and Tarim blocks is a key issue in defining the tectonic framework of China. We report here that rocks from the Paleozoic (Caledonian) ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic (UHPM) belt also record a Grenville-age orogenic event in the Qaidam-Qilian block that lies between the South China and Tarim blocks. This event is marked by the presence of a juvenile Grenville-age continental margin that had been subducted to and exhumed from mantle depths of 100-200 km at the present-day location of northern Tibetan Plateau. The magmatic and metamorphic ages of 900-1000 Ma recorded in the gneisses provide direct evidence for this Grenville-age orogeny that extends northwestward from the Yangtze block, to the Qaidam-Qilian block, and to the Tarim block. This Grenville-age orogen along the North Qaidam UHPM belt (1) represents the link for the once South China-Qaidam-Qilian-Tarim continent, which, we name here as the South-West China United Continent (SWCUC), had existed before the India-Asia collision, (2) sets a framework for precise reconstruction of Supercontinent Rodinia, and (3) presents an example of multi-epoch tectonic recycles, represented by the Neoproterozoic Grenvillian orogenesis and the Early Paleozoic Caledonian orogenesis. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available