4.5 Article

Micro-FTIR spectroscopic signatures of Bacterial lipids in Proterozoic microfossils

Journal

PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH
Volume 173, Issue 1-4, Pages 19-26

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2009.03.006

Keywords

Micro-FTIR; Prokaryotic fossil; Aliphatic CH moieties; Lipid; Bacteria; Archaea

Funding

  1. 21st Century COE program
  2. Ministry of Education Culture, Sports, Technology and Science, Japan
  3. Yoshida Scholarship Foundation
  4. MEXT's
  5. KAKENHI [19740310]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19740310] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precambrian microbial fossils show carbonaceous cellular structure, which often resemble in shape and size cyanobacteria and other prokaryotes. Morphological taxonomy of these minute, simple, and more or less degraded fossils is, however, often not enough to determine their precise phylogenetic positions. Here we report the results of micro-FTIR spectroscopic analyses of well-preserved microfossils in similar to 850 Ma and similar to 1900 Ma stromatolites, together with those of 8 species of extant prokaryotes and 5 of eukaryotes for comparison. These Proterozoic fossils have low CH3/CH2 absorbance ratios (R-3/2 < 0.5) of aliphatic CH moieties, suggesting selective preservation of long, straight, aliphatic carbon chains probably derived from bacterial membrane lipids. All the observed R-3/2 values of coccoids, filaments and amorphous organic matter resemble lipid fractions of extant Bacteria including cyanobacteria, but not Archaea. The results indicate that Proterozoic microfossils belong to Bacteria,which is consistent with the cyanobacterial origin inferred from morphology. Moreover, the R3/2 Value of fossilized cell would reflect chemical composition of its precursor membrane lipid, thus could be a useful new tracer for distinguishing Archaea, Bacteria and possibly Eucarya for fossilized and extant microorganisms. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available