4.7 Article

Dispersion characteristics of dry and colloidal nano-titania into epoxy resin

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 268, Issue -, Pages 158-164

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.08.035

Keywords

Hydrothermal synthesis; Nanoparticles; Surface modification; Hybrid materials

Funding

  1. Military Technical College

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are well known problems with the dispersion of inorganic nanoadditives into organic medium as they tend to aggregate and agglomerate, therefore the particles act like micron sized particles rather than nanoparticle scale. In this paper, we investigated the differences between dispersing dry and colloidal TiO2 nanoparticles into epoxy resin. The dry TiO2 was commercially obtained P25 and freeze dried TiO2 from continuous hydrothermal synthesis (CHS). The colloidal TiO2 was produced from CHS but without a drying stage. Specific parameters including loading level (1-30 wt.%), mechanical mixing (2-60 min), polymer heating (25-80 degrees C), and dry and wet addition were investigated. The nanoparticle dispersion was investigated with SEM and quantified by using Labview image analysis (National Instruments), in order to quantify the characteristic aggregate dimensions such as perimeter, maximum feret diameter, and size. TiO2 nanoparticles were formulated and surface modified with dodecenyl succinic anhydride (DDSA) by using CHS technique. Online phase transfer was used to produce colloidal DDSA-titania dispersed in toluene which could then be directly integrated into epoxy resin. This approach showed enhanced nanoparticle dispersion (nanoscale dispersion) with minimum aggregation compared with the dispersion of dry nanoparticles. Furthermore, this approach enabled the elimination of nanoparticle freeze drying and the redispersion of aggregated dry nanoparticles into polymeric matrix. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available