4.7 Article

Removal of NO and fly ash over a carbon supported catalyst: Effects of fly ash concentration and operating time

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages 239-247

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.02.002

Keywords

Fluidized-bed catalytic reactor; Fly ash; NO; Catalyst

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the removal efficiency of NO and fly ash from flue gas over a Cu catalyst supported on modified activated carbon (AC) in a pilot-scale fluidized-bed catalytic reactor. The fly ash came from a coal-fired power plant was used in our experiment. The AC support was pretreated by either HNO3 (AC-N), H2O2, H2SO4, or NaOH. The acidic concentrations in the four catalysts followed the order CuO/AC-N (0.174 mol g(-1)) > CuO/AC-H (0.138 mol g(-1))> CuO/AC-S (0.103 mol g(-1)) > CuO/AC-Na (0.009 mol g(-1)). Good dispersion of nanoscale CuO particles was observed over the modified supports having a large total number of acidic sites. Moreover, the increase in the number of phenolic and carboxylic groups may increase the NO removal efficiency over modified CuO/AC catalysts. The results was also suggested that the total number of acidic groups decreased in the reduction of NO over the CuO/AC catalysts due to the adsorption of NH3 on NO reduction. Simultaneous removal of NO and fly ash in flue gas under different fly ash concentrations and operating times was studied over the CuO/AC-N catalyst. When fly ash (1406-49,108 mg m(-3)) was added in the flue gas, the removal efficiencies of NO and fly ash over Cu/AC-N were 58%-61% and 82%-86%, respectively. At an operating time of 240 min, the removal efficiency of fly ash was 76%, and the NO removal efficiency decreased slightly to 55%. The NO removal efficiency was inhibited slightly under high fly ash concentration and long operating time. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available