4.7 Article

Process-induced phase transformation of carbamazepine dihydrate to its polymorphic anhydrates

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 236, Issue -, Pages 114-121

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.04.059

Keywords

Pharmaceuticals; Hydrates; Drying; Polymorphs

Funding

  1. provision of an Overseas Research Studentship by the Higher Education Funding Council for England
  2. Student Opportunity Funds by Imperial College London

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phase transformation of carbamazepine dihydrate during low pressure and atmospheric dehydration was investigated for a temperature range between 20 degrees C and 50 degrees C. The dihydrate was prepared by crystallisation from a mixture of ethanol and water, prior to dehydration studies at vacuum pressure (10(-3) to 10(2) Torr), 5% to 60% relative humidity (RH) and 5% to 90% solvent partial pressure (P/P-0). During vacuum pressure dehydration, the dihydrate collapsed to the amorphous form undergoing quick liberation of water of hydration, before converting to a mixture of a metastable anhydrous C-monoclinic polymorph (major component) and a P-monoclinic polymorph (minor component) (Fig. 1). Humidified dehydration (>= 30 degrees C) is shown to result in nucleation to a metastable triclinic polymorph, while organic solvent vapour-mediated phase transformation causes reversion to the most stable P-monoclinic anhydrate. The role of water and organic solvent during the dehydration process is investigated and discussed (in context with/with respect to) the molecular mobility and relaxation period required to initiate the nucleation of the more stable anhydrates. It is concluded that the dehydration mechanism itself as well as the metastability of the polymorphic anhydrate product eventually formed are determined by the accessibility of solvent vapour during the dehydration process. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available