4.7 Article

Simulation of catalyst loss from an industrial fluidized bed reactor on the basis of labscale attrition tests

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 214, Issue 1, Pages 21-30

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.07.017

Keywords

Attrition; Circulating fluidized bed; Catalyst loss; Maleic anhydride; Riser-regenerator system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Attrition of catalyst represents a significant economic penalty due to the necessity to make-up the losses on a continual basis. Designing fluidized bed systems to minimize attrition may sacrifice gas-solid contact efficiency that requires pressure to distribute gases in process vessels uniformly. In this paper, the attrition performance of DuPont's vanadium pyrophosphate oxide catalyst (VPP) used in their commercial Circulating Fluidized Bed (CFB) process to convert n-butane to maleic anhydride has been examined. The analysis is based on simulating the commercial conditions in the individual vessels combined with the physical characteristics of the catalyst determined in the laboratory. The comparison of the catalyst loss rate measured in the industrial plant and the simulation results indicates that the measured values are below the values predicted by the simulation. However, the relative change in the catalyst loss rate with operating time is well described. The simulation allows the quantification of the attrition sources in the process. The simulation results revealed that in the present case over 60% of the catalyst loss originates from attrition in the fluidized beds, whereas only 16% originates from attrition in the cyclones. The simulation is an appropriate tool to investigate the influence of parameter changes. Using the simulation the design parameters and operating conditions can be optimized to minimize the catalyst loss rate in the industrial plant. (c) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available