4.2 Article

EXPERIMENTAL MODELING OF INTERACTION BETWEEN THE CARBON PYROCERAM HEART VALVE AND HUMAN BLOOD PLASMA AND FORMATION OF A PROTECTIVE NANOSIZED COATING

Journal

POWDER METALLURGY AND METAL CERAMICS
Volume 50, Issue 1-2, Pages 62-66

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11106-011-9303-3

Keywords

carbon-B(4)C composite; blood plasma; interaction mechanisms; electrochemical polarization; nanocrystalline film

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nanocrystalline material of an artificial heart valve sintered from 15 wt.% B(4)C with crystals <10 nm in size uniformly distributed in 85 wt.% carbon with particles about 10 nm in size has exceptionally high chemical stability in human blood plasma. The electrochemical interaction resulting from contact of the valve surface with a potential trace impurity (for example, iron) is experimentally modeled by polarization from an external current source to simulate an extreme corrosion event. The interaction kinetics is studied at 37 degrees C using the method of anodic polarization curves. The elemental composition of interaction products is analyzed by emission spectroscopy using a DFS-13 spectrograph; the composition and thickness of the film layers formed on the valve surface during electrolysis are determined with quantitative Auger electron spectroscopy using a Riber LAS-2000 device. It is established that a nanocrystalline film 350 nm thick forms after 3 h electrolysis on the ceramic surface of the heart valve. The film contains to 94.0 at.% C and to 6.0 at.% N (including to 89.5 at.% C as nanocrystalline graphite and to 4.5 at.% C as nanocrystalline C(3)N(4), as well as to 6.0 at.% N in C(3)N(4)) and an insignificant amount of sulfur and inclusions of boron and oxygen atoms. It is shown that the film results from the discharge of anions of corresponding alpha-amino acids (amino acid remains of complex blood protein chains) containing heterocycle rings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available