4.0 Article

Texture and structural refinement using neutron diffraction data from molybdite (MoO3) and calcite (CaCO3) powders and a Ni-rich Ni50.7Ti49.30 alloy

Journal

POWDER DIFFRACTION
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 315-326

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1154/1.3257906

Keywords

preferred orientation; texture; neutron powder diffraction; March model; generalized spherical harmonics; molybdite; calcite; Ti50.70Ni49.30 shape memory alloy

Funding

  1. National Institute of Standards and Technology
  2. U.S. Department of Commerce
  3. Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. NSF Cooperative Agreement [EAR 01-35554]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preferred orientation or texture is a common feature of experimental powder patterns. The mathematics of two commonly used models for preferred orientation-the March-Dollase and the generalized spherical-harmonic models-is reviewed. Both models were applied individually to neutron powder data from uniaxially pressed molybdite (MoO3) and calcite (CaCO3) powders in Rietveld analyses, as well as the as-received powders. The structural refinement results are compared to single-crystal structures. The results indicate that reasonable refinement of crystal structures can be obtained using either the March model or generalized spherical-harmonic description. However, the generalized spherical-harmonic description provided better Rietveld fits than the March model for the molybdite and calcite. Therefore, the generalized spherical-harmonic description is recommended for correction of preferred orientation in neutron diffraction analysis for both crystal structure refinement and phase composition analysis. Subsequently, the generalized spherical-harmonic description is extended to crystal structure refinement of annealed and the aged polycrystalline Ni-rich Ni50.7Ti49.30 shape memory alloys. (C) 2009 International Centre for Diffraction Data. [DOI: 10.1154/1.3257906]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available