4.7 Article

Genetic evaluation of carcass composition and fat deposition in Japanese quail

Journal

POULTRY SCIENCE
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages 2202-2208

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01570

Keywords

Japanese quail; carcass; fat deposition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current research was conducted to estimate heritability and genetic correlations for carcass composition and fat deposition in Japanese quail at 42 and 91 d of age. Studied traits were BW at 42 and 91 d of age (BW42, BW91), carcass weight and percentage, breast meat weight and percentage, thigh weight and percentage, abdominal fat weight and abdominal fat percentage (AFP), skin weight and skin percentage (SP) as a measure of subcutaneous fat, and the percentage of breast intramuscular fat (IFP). Genetic parameters were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood using ASREML software. The heritability estimates of BW and the weight of carcass traits were higher (from 0.45 for BW42 to 0.63 for breast meat weight) than the percentage of carcass traits (from 0.11 for thigh percentage to 0.19 for breast meat percentage). The heritability estimates for SP, AFP, and IFP as fat deposition tissues were 0.17, 0.26, and 0.20, respectively. There were high genetic correlations between BW42 with the weight and percentage of carcass components (from 0.65 to 0.98). Body weight at 42 d of age also showed positive genetic correlations with skin weight and SP (0.80 and 0.23, respectively), abdominal fat weight and AFP (0.44 and 0.21, respectively), and IFP (0.28). A positive genetic correlation between SP and AFP (0.51) was observed. Present results indicated that the percentage of breast intramuscular fat is a heritable trait and selection for increasing BW and decreasing abdominal and subcutaneous fats will improve carcass composition and breast meat quality in Japanese quail. In addition, selection against abdominal and subcutaneous fat does not change intramuscular fat and the quality of breast meat.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available