4.7 Article

Application of acetyl salicylic acid and chemically different chitosans against storage carrot rot

Journal

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 51-60

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.04.006

Keywords

Native-PAGE; N-deacetylation; POD; PPO; Spectrophotometry

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303015]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY12C14007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to evaluate antifungal activity of three chemically different chitosans named as A, B and C at different concentrations against three isolates of Sclerotinia scierotiorum, the causal agent of storage carrot rot, by in vitro and in vivo tests. In addition, potential of SAR (systemic acquired resistance) induced by the chitosans and acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) was assessed against the disease. The degree of N-deacetylation (DN) and the molecular weight of chitosans A, B and C were 85%-1129 kDa, 95%-521 kDa and 75%-607 kDa, respectively. The concentrations 2 g/L and 5 g/L of all chitosans were significantly able to decrease mycelial growth, sclerotia formation and carpogenic germination of the pathogen. Four hours and three days before inoculation with the pathogen, application of chitosans and ASA reduced severity of carrot rot in all isolates. However, mycelial growth and sclerotia formation of isolate 2 was more reduced than other isolates. In accordance with in vitro tests, chitosan B showed the highest inhibitory efficacy against the disease. The fungicidal effect of chitosan increased when the DN decreased and there was a negative correlation between the mycelial growth inhibition and the molecular weight of chitosans. The enzyme analysis showed that the activity of phenylalanine ammonia layse, polyphenoloxidase and peroxidase increase in the inoculated carrots after application of different chitosans and ASA. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available