4.7 Article

Superficial scald control after delayed treatment of apple fruit with diphenylamine (DPA) and 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP)

Journal

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 45-52

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.05.006

Keywords

apple; superficial scald; ethylene; firmness; alpha-farnesene; Malus x domestica Borkh; senescent breakdown

Funding

  1. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station [NE-1018]
  2. New York Apple Research and Development Program
  3. AgroFresh, Inc

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of delayed treatments of diphenylamine (DPA) and 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on superficial scald development of 'Cortland' and 'Law Rome' apples were examined. Fruit were stored in air at 0.5 degrees C for 24 weeks after being treated with DPA or 1-MCP at harvest or after delays of 1, 7, 14 or 21 d ('Law Rome', experiment 1) or at harvest or after delays of 3, 7, 14 or 21 d ('Cortland' and 'Law Rome', experiment 2). Inhibition of scald development was affected by cultivar, DPA concentration, and delays between harvest and either DPA or 1-MCP application. Loss of scald control was associated with increasing internal ethylene concentrations (IEC) in the fruit with greater time delays before treatment, but to a greater extent for 1-MCP than DPA. DPA effects on scald development were independent alpha-farnesene accumulation in the fruit skin but were associated with inhibition of its oxidation as indicated by lower concentrations of conjugated trienols (CTols). In contrast, 1-MCP effects were dependent on inhibition of alpha-farnesene accumulation and thereby the availability of less substrate for oxidation. The results show that minimal delays between harvest and treatment of fruit with either DPA or 1-MCP are necessary to maximize control of scald, but may be more critical for 1-MCP than for DPA. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available