4.5 Article

Reconciling Development and Conservation under Coastal Squeeze from Rising Sea Level

Journal

CONSERVATION LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 361-368

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12213

Keywords

Climate change; planning; priority setting; adaptation; retreat; managed realignment; defend

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. ARC [FS100100024, FS110200005]
  3. Australian Research Council [FS100100024, FS110200005] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among the biggest global challenges for policymakers is the development of land use policies robust to climate change impacts. While diverse fields can inform adaptation, integrated social-ecological assessment of the multiple adaptation options are rare and cannot be easily applied. Here, we build on past studies by undertaking an integrated fine scale and strategic allocation of sea level rise (SLR) adaptation options that can direct policy making. We use models of probabilistic SLR inundation, urban growth, and sub-and intertidal ecosystem migration, to investigate the impacts of different SLR adaptation strategies, and how these can be allocated to best achieve both development and conservation goals. Coastal adaptation will involve trade-offs among development and conservation objectives and these will vary based on the extent to which sea levels rise. There will be trade-offs between conservation objectives regardless of the adaptation options chosen, however, retreat does provide opportunities for enabling the expansion of coastal ecosystems inland. Local governments can save billions of dollars and minimize political conflict between conservation and development goals through integrated strategic spatial planning. Our planning approach both informs policy and is transferable to other coastal regions faced with a rising sea.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available