4.5 Article

Enhanced thermal conductivity of epoxy-matrix composites with hybrid fillers

Journal

POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 26-31

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pat.3414

Keywords

polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); hybrid composites; thermal properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results of thermal conductivity study of epoxy-matrix composites filled with different type of powders are reported. Boron nitride and aluminum nitride micro-powders with different size distribution and surface modification were used. A representative set of samples has been prepared with different contents of the fillers. The microstructure was investigated by SEM observations. Thermal conductivity measurements have been performed at room temperature and for selected samples it was also measured as a function of temperature from 300K down to liquid helium temperatures. The most spectacular enhancement of the thermal conductivity was obtained for composites filled with hybrid fillers of boron nitride-silica and aluminum nitride-silica. In the case of sample with 31vol.% of boron nitride-silica hybrid filler it amounts to 114% and for the sample with 45vol.% of hybrid filler by 65% as compared with the reference composite with silica filler. However, in the case of small aluminum nitride grains application, large interfacial areas were introduced, promoting creation of thermal resistance barriers and causing phonon scattering more effective. As a result, no thermal conductivity improvement was obtained. Different characters of temperature dependencies are observed for hybrid filler composites which allowed identifying the component filler of the dominant contribution to the thermal conductivity in each case. The data show a good agreement with predictions of Agari-Uno model, indicating the importance of conductive paths forming effect already at low filler contents. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available