4.7 Article

X-ray CT microtomography and mechanical response of foamed polysiloxane elastomers

Journal

POLYMER TESTING
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 102-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.09.008

Keywords

3D X-ray tomography; GARField magnetic resonance; Polydimethyl siloxane; Compression

Ask authors/readers for more resources

3D X-ray computer microtomography (CT) experiments have been performed to assess the microstructure of scaled cellular polysiloxane elastomers and to predict how key morphological features alter as a function of compressive loading. In the work reported here, full scale (nominally 600 mu m pore size) and half scale (nominally 300 mu m pore size) polydimethylsiloxane foams (M97) were prepared using extractable urea particles, and tested. Cl' test methodology was developed to image foam microstructure at different levels of compression. 1D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) experiments have also been performed on full scale foams for baseline characterisation. Material porosity, bulk density and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) stress/strain responses as a function of compression were recorded. Our results show that undesirable engineering stress responses are evident when the material microstructure (cell size and shape) is non-uniform and complex. This is particularly evident when non-spherical urea particles are used, leading to undesirable scaled foam microstructures with mechanical responses that do not match that shown by 'full scale' versions. Through the use of X-ray CT and MRI, our studies have provided insights into the link between manufacturing, polymer architecture (cell size/shape) and mechanical response of scaled M97 cellular materials. The data collected will support materials FEA (finite element model) code development activities, as well as help identify how the material architecture can be modified to achieve more controlled and uniform mechanical responses. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available