4.4 Article

Effect of Copolymerization Time on the Microstructure and Properties of Polypropylene/Poly(ethylene-co-propylene) In-Reactor Alloys

Journal

POLYMER JOURNAL
Volume 41, Issue 12, Pages 1098-1104

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1295/polymj.PJ2009150

Keywords

PP/EPR In-Reactor Alloy; Fractionation; Microstructure

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2005CB623806]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20734006]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-SW-H07]
  4. Petrochemical Research Institute, PetroChina. Co. Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three Polypropylene/Poly(ethylene-co-propylene) (PP/EPR) in-reactor alloys produced by a two-stage slurry/gas polymerization had different ethylene contents and mechanical properties, which were achieved by controlling the copolymerization time. The three alloys were fractionated into five fractions via temperature rising dissolution fractionation (TRDF), respectively. The chain structures of the whole samples and their fractions were analyzed using high-temperature gel permeation chromatography (GPC), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (C-13 NMR), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) techniques. These three in-reactor alloys mainly contained four portions: ethylenepropylene random copolymer (EPR), ethylene-propylene (EP) segmented and block copolymers, and propylene homopolymer. The increased copolymerization time caused the increased ethylene content of the sample. The weight percent of EPR, EP segmented and block copolymer also became higher. The more EPR content indeed improves the toughness of the alloy but lowers its stiffness. Increasing the ethylene content in the EPR fraction and EP segmented and block copolymer, as well as the suitable content of EPR, is believed to be the key factors resulting in the excellent toughness-stiffness balance of in-reactor alloys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available