4.5 Article

Hierarchical porous polyaniline supercapacitor electrode from polyaniline/silica self- aggregates

Journal

POLYMER INTERNATIONAL
Volume 67, Issue 12, Pages 1670-1676

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pi.5692

Keywords

hierarchical porous PANI; silica; self-assembly; self-aggregates; template

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21401079, 21501069]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51626B]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20140158, BK20161128, BK20161166]
  4. Natural Science Fund for Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province [18 KJD 430008, 17KJB430032]
  5. Research Project of Xuzhou [KC15SM038]
  6. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [PPZY2015B181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To lengthen the lifecycles of polyaniline (PANI) electrodes, a hierarchical porous PANI was synthesized from PANI/silica self-aggregates through a facile one-pot method. Hydrogen bonding between N-H groups in aniline/PANI and-OH groups in nanosilica template led to a type of self-assembly, which enabled the formation of uniform nanoparticles. Silica self-aggregates provided macroporous channels, resulting in a decreased diffusion distance. After removal of the hard template, the porous PANI had a large, porous surface area (55.89 m(2) g(-1)), in comparison with nonporous PANI (12.45 m(2) g(-1)). The porous PANI was analyzed using Fourier transform infrared and UV-visible spectroscopies, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, cyclic voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and galvanostatic charge-discharge measurements. Because of its hierarchical structure, the resultant porous PANI possessed a higher capacitance (397 F g(-1)) than nonporous PANI (280 F g(-1)) at 1 A g(-1) in 1 mol L-1 H2SO4 electrolyte. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available