4.5 Article

Flammability and Thermal Degradation of Intumescent Flame-Retardant Polypropylene Composites

Journal

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 767-772

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/pen.21583

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50876048]
  2. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Fire Science [HZ2008-KF01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The flammability of polypropylene (PP) composites containing intumescent flame-retardant additives, i.e., melamine pyrophosphate (MPP) and 1-oxo-4-hydroxymethyl-2,6,7-trioxa-1-phosphabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (PEPA) was characterized by limiting oxygen index (LOI), UL 94 test, and cone calorimeter. In addition, the thermal degradation of the composites was studied using thermogravimetric analysis (TG) and real-time Fourier transform infrared (RTFTIR). It has been found that the PP composite only containing MPP (or PEPA) does not show good flame retardancy even at 30% additive level. Compared with the PP/MPP binary composite, the LOI values of the PP/MPP/PEPA ternary composites at the same additive loading are all increased, and UL 94 rating of the ternary composite (PP3) studied is raised to V-0 rating from no rating (PP/MPP). The cone calorimeter results show that the heat release rate of some ternary composites decreases in comparison with the binary composite. It is noted from the TG data that initial decomposition temperatures of ternary composites are lower than that of the binary composites. The RTFTIR study indicates that the PP/MPP/PEPA composites have higher thermal oxidative stability than the pure PP. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 50:767-772, 2010. (C) 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available