4.7 Article

Synergistic flame retardant effects between hollow glass microspheres and magnesium hydroxide in ethylene-vinyl acetate composites

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 104, Issue -, Pages 87-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.019

Keywords

Synergistic; Hollow glass microspheres; Magnesium hydroxide; Ethylene-vinyl acetate

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51106078, 51206084]
  2. Out-standing Young Scientist Research Award Fund from Shandong Province [BS2011CL018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of flame retardant ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) composites, with different content of magnesium hydroxide (MH) and hollow glass microspheres (HGM), have been prepared. The synergistic flame retardant effects of HGM with MH in EVA/MH blends have been studied by limiting oxygen index (LOI), UL-94 tests, cone calorimeter test (CCT), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. The LOI and UL-94 results show that when 2.00 wt% magnesium hydroxide (MH) is substituted with HGM, the LOI value can be raised to the maximum value of 42.1 among all samples. The data obtained from the CCT test indicate the heat release rate (HRR) of EVA/MH/HGM sample with 1.00 wt% HGM reduced by 37% when compared with EVA/MH sample without HGM. The digital photo graphs and scanning electron microscope (SEM) of char residues after CCT give positive evidence that the synergistic flame retardant effects between HGM and MH can be described that HGM mixed with MH can decrease the melt viscosity of EVA/MH/HGM, and promote the homogeneous dispersion of MH. HGM also can promote the formation of compact charred layers and prevent the charred layers from cracking, which effectively protects the underlying materials from burning. The TGA results reveal that EVA/MH/HGM samples show higher thermal stability at high temperature than EVA/MH sample. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available