4.7 Article

In-situ compatibilization of poly(lactic acid) and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) blends by using dicumyl peroxide as a free-radical initiator

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 145-151

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.025

Keywords

PLA; PBAT; Compatibilization; Rheology; Toughening; Hydrolysis

Funding

  1. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20130147]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51303067, 51173072]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP1016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In-situ compatibilized poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PLA/PBAT) blends are prepared by using dicumyl peroxide (DCP) as a free radical initiator. The in-situ compatibilization leads to a reduction in PBAT domain size and an enhancement in their interfacial adhesion. The storage modulus (G') and complex viscosity (n(*)) of the blends are increased with increasing DCP content. Meanwhile, a solid-like behavior is observed in the low frequency zone indicating an existence of branching and network structures in the blends. The mechanical properties of the PLA are improved by incorporation of the PBAT with the in-situ compatibilization, e.g. the elongation at break is increased from 4% to 300% and the notched Izod impact toughness is increased from 28 J/m to 110 J/m. The morphology of local deformation reveals that internal PBAT cavitation, interfacial debonding and matrix yielding are responsible for the tensile toughness of PLA/PBAT blends while matrix yielding is proposed to be the dominating toughening mechanism for the in-situ compatibilized blends. In addition, hydrolysis test displays that the hydrolytic behavior of the PLA was not affected obviously by the PBAT and the in-situ compatibilization. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available