4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Flax fibre reinforced PLA/TPS biocomposites flame retarded with multifunctional additive system

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 63-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.10.025

Keywords

Flame retardancy; Poly lactic acid; Thermoplastic starch; Plasticizer; Natural fibre reinforcement; Fibre treatment

Funding

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [OTKA K105257]
  2. ERA Chemistry Programme [NN 82426]
  3. European Union [298090]
  4. New Szechenyi Plan [TAMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR-2010-0002]
  5. Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  6. Suzuki Foundation
  7. Suzuki Company
  8. [TAMOP-4.2.23-10/1-2010-0009]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fully biodegradable composites were developed, possessing prominent mechanical performance and reduced flammability at the same time. The manufactured composites consisted of PLA/TPS biopolymer matrices reinforced with chopped flax fibres. The flammability of the prepared biocomposites was reduced by a newly synthesized multifunctional additive system. Glycerol phosphate (GP), a plasticizer of starch with flame retardant potential, and a novel phosphorous-silane (PSil), applied as a surface treating agent of the reinforcing biofibres, were successfully combined in order to reduce the flammability of the prepared biocomposites. Owing to the beneficial effect of the applied multifunctional additive system, a loading of as low as 10 wt% of ammonium polyphosphate (APP) proved to be sufficient to provide prominent levels of flame retardancy to the composites, i.e. V-O rating according to UL94, 33 vol% LOI and a 40% reduction of heat emission were achieved. Furthermore, the combined application of the surface treated reinforcing flax fibres and plasticizer in the biodegradable, flame retarded biocomposites resulted in well-balanced strength and stiffness. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available