4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Accelerated ageing of polylactide in aqueous environments: Comparative study between distilled water and seawater

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 108, Issue -, Pages 319-329

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.01.020

Keywords

PLA; Accelerated ageing; Hydrothermal ageing; Degradation

Funding

  1. SERPBIO Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pollution of nature by plastics is a major environmental problem and the challenge for the future is to manage the lifetime of polymers better. The aim of this study is to establish a baseline on degradation mechanism and degradation kinetics for lifetime prediction of polylactide (PLA) in a marine environment. The ageing of PLA was accelerated by raising temperature in distilled water, filtered and renewed seawater and natural seawater. Samples were immersed in distilled water for six months at different temperatures (25, 30, 40 and 50 degrees C) in order to evaluate the influence of temperature on PLA degradation kinetics and to predict lifetime. Then, samples were immersed in seawater both in the laboratory and at sea, in order to compare the effects of environment, marine organisms and salt, on degradation. The different degradation steps were followed by gravimetry, tensile tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), steric exclusion chromatography (SEC) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). In distilled water, accelerated ageing of PLA is complex with deviation from Fickian behaviour at higher temperature. Moreover, immersion in distilled water induces morphological changes, in particular holes, which are absent in seawater at 40 degrees C for the same immersion time. Indeed, seawater has little impact on the diffusion kinetics but affects M-infinity values, which are slightly lower compared to the distilled water uptake. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available