4.7 Article

Effect of urea additive on the thermal decomposition kinetics of flame retardant greige cotton nonwoven fabric

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages 738-746

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.02.008

Keywords

Cotton; Flame; Nitrogen phosphorus synergy; Kinetics; Thermogravimetry; NMR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urea is well known to have a synergistic action with phosphorus-based flame retardants (FRs) in enhancing the FR performance of cellulosic materials, but the effect of urea on the thermal decomposition kinetics has not been thoroughly studied. In this study, the activation energy (E-a) for the thermal decomposition of greige cotton nonwoven fabrics treated with various amounts of urea at fixed contents of diammonium phosphate (DAP), was measured using the Kissinger, Friedman, and Flynn-Wall-Ozawa methods. The three methods produced consistent results revealing a dual function of urea additive in the kinetics depending on the concentration. Those functions were correlated with the synergistic FR action of urea. Up to a certain concentration, the addition of urea raised the overall E-a. The steeply increasing trend of E-a observed in the low conversions indicates that urea enhanced the multiple reactions of DAP, which were confirmed by P-31 MAS NMR and ATR-FTIR. Higher concentrations of urea additive, however, significantly lowered the E-a values for both the DAP reactions and the decomposition of cellulose. As evidenced by a slight reduction in char yield, the decrease in E-a suggests that the excess of urea acted to facilitate the diffusion of volatiles and heat transfer in the cotton structure, resulting in catalyzing the decomposition of cellulose at low temperatures. The latter function was predominant when the greater synergistic FR action of urea was achieved. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available