4.7 Article

Triazene compounds as a novel and effective class of flame retardants for polypropylene

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 97, Issue 6, Pages 948-954

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.03.019

Keywords

Triazenes; Polymer additives; Halogen free flame retardants; Polypropylene

Funding

  1. BASF, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four triazene derivatives have been synthesized, i.e. bis-4,4'-(3,3'-dimethyltriazene)-diphenyl ether (1), bis-4,4'-(3,3'-diethyltriazene)-diphenyl ether (2), 2,2,6,6,-tetramethyl-1-phenylazo-piperidine (3) and 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-phenylazopiperidine (4). Their thermal properties were determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and the fragmentation patterns were analysed by simultaneous mass spectrometry (MS) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry of off-gases from a thermogravimetric analyser (TGA). The triazenes exhibited an exothermic decomposition peak at temperatures between 230 and 280 degrees C when the triazene units were homolytically cleaved into various aminyl, resonance-stabilized aryl radicals and different CH fragments with simultaneous evolution of elemental nitrogen. The potential of triazenes as a new class of flame retardants for polypropylene films was investigated by performing ignitability test in accordance to DIN 4102-1/B2 standard. Polypropylene samples containing very low concentration of only 0.5 wt% of any of these triazene (R-N-1 = N-2-(NR)-R-3'R) additives passed the test with B2 classification. Notably, no burning dripping could be detected. The average burning times are very short with exceptionally low weight losses. Based on this preliminary FR testing we have shown that the triazene compounds constitute a new and interesting family of radical generators for flame retarding of polymeric materials. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available