4.7 Article

Effect of a phosphorus-containing flame retardant on the thermal properties and ease of ignition of poly(lactic acid)

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages 1557-1561

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.05.018

Keywords

Poly(lactic acid); Flame retardant; Phosphorus; Burning behaviour

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [50703026, 50933005]
  2. International Foundation for Science (IFS) [F/4285-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An aryl polyphenylphosphonate, poly(9-oxa-10-(2,5-dihydro-xyphenyl) phospha-phenanthrene-10-oxide) phenylphosphonate (WLA-3), was used to prepare a flame-retardant poly(lactic acid) (PLA) by direct melt compounding. The thermal behaviour, burning behaviour and mechanical properties of the flame-retardant PLA systems have been investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), vertical burning test (UL-94), limiting oxygen index (LOI), cone calorimeter test (CCT) and tensile test. The flame retardance mechanism has been studied via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), gel permeation chromatography (GPC), and P content analysis. The UL-94 ratings of PLA's containing 7phr (W-7P) and 10phr (M-10P) of WLA-3 were enhanced to V-0 from no rating for neat PLA. However, the cone calorimetry of flame-retardant PLA (W-7P) only showed a little decrease in heat release rate (HRR), peak of heat release rate (PHRR) and total heat release (THR) compared to neat PLA. TGA results showed that the PLA containing different amounts of WLA-3 presented more complicated thermal decomposition behaviours than neat PLA. Additionally, the results from DSC and tensile tests showed that the addition of WLA-3 into PIA had slight impact on the crystallization behaviours and tensile properties. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available