4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Flame retardant challenges for textiles and fibres: New chemistry versus innovatory solutions

Journal

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages 377-392

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.03.036

Keywords

Flame retardant; Halogen; Phosphorus; Textile; Fibre; Nanotechnology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Almost 50 years ago, the 1950-1960 period witnessed the development of the chemistry underlying most of today's successful and durable flame retardant treatments for fibres and textiles. In today's more critical markets in terms of environmental sustainability, chemical toxicological acceptability, performance and cost, many of these are now being questioned. Are there potential replacements for established, durable formaldehyde-based flame retardants such as those based on tetrakis (hydroxylmethyl) phosphonium salt and alkyl-substituted. N-methylol phosphonopropionamide chemistries for cellulosic textiles? is an often-asked question. Can we produce char-forming polyester flame retardants? and Can we really produce effective halogen-free replacements for coatings and back-coated textiles? are others. These questions are addressed initially as a historical review of research undertaken in the second half of the twentieth century which is the basis of most currently available, commercialised flame retardant fibres and textiles. Research reported during the first decade of the twenty first century and which primarily addresses the current issues of environmental sustainability and the search for alternative flame retardant solutions, the need to increase char-forming character in synthetic fibres and the current interest in nanotechnology is critically discussed. The possible roles of micro- and nano-surface treatments of fibre surfaces and their development using techniques such as plasma technology are also reviewed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available