4.7 Article

Development and Study of Fully Biodegradable Composite Materials Based on Poly(butylene succinate) and Hemp Fibers or Hemp Shives

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 407-421

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.23194

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology
  2. EUROSTARS Programme
  3. European Regional Development Fund
  4. Small and Medium Sized Company [(SMEs): CHIMAR HELLAS SA (Greece)]
  5. Small and Medium Sized Company [(SMEs): VALBOPAN SA (Portugal)]
  6. Small and Medium Sized Company [(SMEs): HempFlax BV (The Netherlands)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of natural fibers to reinforce polymers is an established practice, and biocomposites have gained an increased interest in areas such as automotive, construction, and agriculture. The purpose of the present work was the preparation and study of fully biodegradable (green) composite materials using poly(butylene succinate) (PBSu) as polymeric matrix and hemp fibers and shives as fillers. Composites containing 15, 30, 50, 60, and 70 wt% of fillers were prepared by melt mixing in a twin screw extruder. The composites were studied using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and differential scanning calorimeter while the dispersion and interfacial adhesion were studied with scanning electron microscopy. From mechanical properties measurements, it was found that tensile and impact strength are both affected by the type and the amount of the used filler. The degree of crystallinity of PBSu was found to decrease by increasing the filler content, although that both fillers can act as nucleating agents. Finally, the degradation rate during enzymatic hydrolysis and soil burial increased in all biocomposites by increasing the filler content. PBSu/hemp shive composites showed higher biodegradation rates than PBSu/hemp fiber composites. (C) 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available