4.7 Article

Nonisothermal Melt Crystallization Kinetics of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Barite Nanocomposites

Journal

POLYMER COMPOSITES
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 1504-1514

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.20937

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [07XD14014]
  2. 863 Program [2007AA03Z335]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [08YZ07, J50102]
  4. Research Foundation for the Excellent Youth Scholars of Shanghai [shu-07052]
  5. Chinese Ministry of Education [208182]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/Barite nanocomposites were prepared by direct melt compounding. The nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetics of pure PET and PET/Barite nanocomposites, containing unmodified Barite and surface-modified Barite (SABarite), was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) under different cooling rates. With the addition of barite nanoparticles, the crystallization peak became wider and shifted to higher temperature and the crystallization rate increased. Several analysis methods were used to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of pure PET and its nanocomposites. The Jeziorny modification of the Avrami analysis was only valid for describing the early stage of crystallization but was not able to describe the later stage of PET crystallization. Also, the Ozawa method failed to describe the nonisothermal crystallization behavior of PET. A combined Avrami and Ozawa equation, developed by Liu, was used to more accurately model the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of PET. The crystallization activation energies calculated by Kissinger, Takhor, and Augis-Bennett models were comparable. The results reveal that the different interfacial interactions between matrix and nanoparticles are responsible for the disparate effect on the crystallization ability of PET. POLYM. COMPOS., 31:1504-1514, 2010. (C) 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available