4.6 Article

The value of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor diabetic foot osteomyelitis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 40-45

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12545

Keywords

Biomarkers; Diabetic foot infection; Erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Osteomyelitis; Procalcitonin

Funding

  1. NIDDK Diabetic Complications Consortium (DiaComp) [DK076169]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we assessed the effectiveness of inflammatory markers to diagnose and monitor the treatment of osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot. We evaluated 35 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital with infected foot ulcers. Patients were divided in two groups based on the results of bone culture and histopathology: osteomyelitis and no osteomyelitis. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP1) were measured at baseline after 3 and 6 weeks of standard therapy. PCT levels in the osteomyelitis group were significantly higher at baseline than in the group with no osteomyelitis (P = 0049). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the levels of the other markers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL-6 levels significantly declined in the group with osteomyelitis after starting therapy, while MCP-1 increased (P = 0002). TNF and MIP1 levels were below range in 80 out of 97 samples and therefore not reported. Our results suggest that PCT might be useful to distinguish osteomyelitis in infected foot ulcers. CRP, ESR, PCT and IL-6 are valuable when monitoring the effect of therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available