4.7 Article

Brittle-ductile transition of double network hydrogels: Mechanical balance of two networks as the key factor

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 914-923

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.12.066

Keywords

Double network hydrogels; Brittle-ductile transition; Fracture

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [124225006]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23240070] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tough double network (DN) hydrogels are a kind of interpenetrating network (IPN) gels with a contrasting structure; they consist of a rigid and brittle 1st network with dilute, densely cross-linked short chains and a soft and ductile 2nd network with concentrated, loosely cross-linked long chains. In this work, we focus on how the brittle gel changes into a tough one by increasing the amount of ductile component. By comparing the molecular structures of the individual first network and second network gels, we found that the true key mechanical factor that governs the brittle ductile transition is the fracture stress ratio of the two networks, sigma(f,2)/sigma(f,1). This ratio is related to the density ratio of elastically effective polymer strands of the two networks, nu(e,2)/nu(e,1), where the inter-network topological entanglement makes dominant contribution to nu(e,2). When nu(e,2)/nu(e,1) < k = 3.8-9.5, the second network fractures right after the fracture of the first network, and the gels are brittle. When nu(e,2)/nu(e,1) > k, only the first network fractures. As a result, the brittle first network serves as sacrificial bonds, imparting toughness of DN gels. The study also confirms that the load transfer between the two networks is via inter-network topological entanglement. This result provides essential information to design tough materials based on the double network concept. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available