4.7 Article

Elaboration and properties of plasticised chitosan-based exfoliated nano-biocomposites

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 54, Issue 14, Pages 3654-3662

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.017

Keywords

Chitosan; Nano-biocomposite; Montmorillonite

Funding

  1. Australian Academy of Science
  2. University of Queensland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of plasticised chitosan-based materials and nanocomposites were successfully prepared by thermomechanical kneading. During the processing, the montmorillonite (MMT) platelets were fully delaminated. The nanoclay type and content and the preparation method were seen to have an impact on the crystallinity, morphology, glass transition temperature, and mechanical properties of the samples. When higher content (5%) of MMT-Na+ or either content (2.5% or 5%) of chitosan-organomodified MMT (OMMT-Ch) was used, increases in crystallinity and glass transition temperature were observed. Compared to the neat chitosan, the plasticised chitosan-based nano-biocomposites showed drastically improved mechanical properties, which can be ascribed to the excellent dispersion and exfoliation of nanoclay and the strong affinity between the nanoclay and the chitosan matrix. The best mechanical properties obtained were Young's modulus of 164.3 MPa, tensile strength of 13.9 MPa, elongation at break of 62.1%, and energy at break of 0.671 MPa. While the degree of biodegradation was obviously increased by the presence of glycerol, a further increase might be observed especially by the addition of unmodified nanoclay. This could surprisingly contribute to full (100%) biodegradation after 160 days despite the well-known antimicrobial property of chitosan. The results in this study demonstrate the great potential of plasticised chitosan-based nano-biocomposites in applications such as e.g., biodegradable packaging materials. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available