4.7 Article

Thermo-responsive behavior of hybrid core cross-linked polymer micelles with biocompatible shells

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 52, Issue 13, Pages 2810-2818

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.033

Keywords

Micelle; Thermo-responsive; Cross-linking

Funding

  1. Nanotechnology Network, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [22350106, 22655036]
  3. UBE Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22655036, 22350106] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poly(2-(methacryloyloxy)ethyl phosphorylcholine)-b-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (pMPC-b-p(NIPAM/DMA)) was synthesized via reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) controlled radical polymerization. Below the critical aggregation temperature (CAT), i.e., about 40 degrees C, the diblock copolymer dissolved in water as a unimer with a hydrodynamic radius (R-h) of ca. 10 nm. Above CAT the diblock copolymers formed polymer micelles with an R-h of ca. 40 nm, composed of a p(NIPAM/DMA) core and biocompatible pMPC shell due to hydrophobic self-aggregation of the thermo-responsive p(NIPAM/DMA) block. The pendent 2-(N,N-dimethylamino)ethyl group of DMA in pMPC-b-p(NIPAM/DMA) reduced HAuCl4 to form gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and could attach to their surfaces. The cores of these polymer micelles could be cross-linked above CAT by HAuCl4, which upon being reduced generated AuNPs as cross-linking points to form core cross-linked (CCL) polymer micelles, as confirmed by UV-vis absorption and dynamic light scattering measurements. The CCL polymer micelles absorbed visible light at 532 nm because of surface plasmon resonances of the AuNPs. The R-h of the CCL polymer micelles remained at ca. 40 nm regardless of temperature. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available