4.7 Article

Influence of polydopamine deposition conditions on pure water flux and foulant adhesion resistance of reverse osmosis, ultrafiltration, and microfiltration membranes

Journal

POLYMER
Volume 51, Issue 15, Pages 3472-3485

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.05.008

Keywords

Polydopamine; Membranes; Modification

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DMR 0423914]
  2. Advanced Hydro, Inc.
  3. National Science Foundation IREE (International Research and Education in Engineering)
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0931761] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [공동기술-2011-645] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  7. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [R31-2008-000-10092-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of polydopamine (PDOPA) deposition and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) grafting on pure water flux and bovine serum albumin (BSA) adhesion of two polysulfone ultrafiltration (UF) membranes, a poly(vinylidene fluoride) microfiltration (MF) membrane, and a polyamide reverse osmosis (RO) membrane is reported. When modified with PDOPA, all membranes exhibited a systematic reduction in protein adhesion. For example, 90 min of PDOPA deposition led to at least 96% reduction in BSA adhesion to these membranes at neutral pH. BSA adhesion was further reduced by subsequent PEG grafting to PDOPA (PDOPA-g-PEG). The membranes' pure water flux values (i.e., with no foulants present) were influenced to different extents by PDOPA and PDOPA-g-PEG modifications. In the porous membranes (i.e., the UF and MF membranes), the pure water flux reduction due to these modifications correlated with membrane pore size, with the smallest flux reductions observed in the MF membrane (e.g., <1% flux reduction for all PDOPA modification times considered), which have the largest pores, and the largest flux reductions occurring in UF membranes (e.g., a 40% flux reduction after 90 min of PDOPA deposition), which have pore sizes on the order of the PDOPA deposition thickness. The RO membranes, which are essentially non-porous, exhibited a flux reduction of 25% after 90 min of PDOPA deposition. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available