4.0 Article

OVARIAN SMALL CELL CARCINOMA OF HYPERCALCEMIC TYPE - EVIDENCE OF GERMLINE ORIGIN AND SMARCA4 GENE INACTIVATION. A PILOT STUDY

Journal

POLISH JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 238-246

Publisher

VESALIUS UNIV MEDICAL PUBL
DOI: 10.5114/PJP.2013.39331

Keywords

small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type; immature teratoma; embryonal tumor; atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor; rhabdoid tumor; ovary

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ovarian tumors from two patients, compatible by histological and immunohistochemical criteria with small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type (SCCHT) (WT1 +, EMA dispersed +, synaptophysin + or dispersed +), were extensively sampled in order to find clues to their histogenesis. Subsequently, small foci of immature teratoma were found in both of them (in 1/122 and in 3/80 tumor sections). In one case, microfoci of yolk sac tumor were also present within the teratoma area as well as in the background of the small cell tumor population - in the primary tumor and in omental metastasis. We found a resemblance of the microscopic patterns of SCCHT and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) of the central nervous system, and this prompted us to evaluate INI-1 and SMARCA4 immunohistochemical expression, because their alternative loss is regarded as a molecular hallmark of AT/RT. INI-1 expression was retained, while that of SMARCA4 was lost. We therefore analyzed tumor DNA by PCR amplification and sequencing for mutations in the SMARCA4 gene (NG_011556.1), which were identified in both tumors (c.2184_2206del; nonsense c.3277C>T both in one tumor; nonsense c.3760G>T in another tumor). These data suggest that SCCHT is most likely an embryonal tumor originating from immature teratoma and related to malignant rhabdoid tumor. Further analyses are necessary to determine whether the tumors diagnosed as SCCHT constitute a homogeneous group or represent more than one entity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available