4.3 Article

Sea ice microbial dynamics over an annual ice cycle in Prydz Bay, Antarctica

Journal

POLAR BIOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 7, Pages 993-1002

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-011-1146-3

Keywords

Sea ice; Bacteria; Nanoflagellates; Dinoflagellates; Ciliates; Chlorophyll a

Funding

  1. University of Tasmania
  2. Australian Antarctic Research Assessment Committee

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbial community dynamics within the fast sea ice of Prydz Bay (68A degrees S 78A degrees E) were investigated over an annual cycle at two sites (1 and 3 km offshore) between April and November 2008. There are few long-term sea ice studies, and few that cover the phase of winter darkness when autotrophic processes are curtailed. Mean chlorophyll a concentrations in the ice column ranged between 0.76 and 44.8 mu g L-1 at the 1-km site (Site 1) and 3.11-144.6 mu g L-1 at the 3-km site (Site 2). Highest chlorophyll a usually occurred at the base of the ice. Bacterial concentrations ranged between 0.30 and 2.08 x 10(8) cells L-1, heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNAN) between 0.21 x 10(5) and 2.98 x 10(5) cells L-1 and phototrophic nanoflagellates (PNAN) 0-1.06 x 10(5) cells L-1. While HNAN occurred throughout the year, PNAN were largely absent in winter. Dinoflagellates were a conspicuous and occasionally an abundant element of the community (maximum 17,460 cells L-1), while ciliates were sparse. The bacterial community showed considerable morphological diversity with a dominance of filamentous forms. Bacterial production continued throughout the year ranging between 0 and 22.92 mu g C L-1 day(-1) throughout the ice column. Lowest rates occurred between late June and early August. The sea ice sustained an active and diverse microbial community through its annual extent. The data suggest that during winter darkness the microbial community is dominated by heterotrophic processes, sustained by a pool of dissolved organic carbon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available