4.6 Article

Production of methane and ethylene from plastic in the environment

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200574

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (C-MORE) [DBI-0424599, OCE-1260164]
  2. Simons Foundation (SCOPE Award) [329108]
  3. Balzan Prize for Oceanography
  4. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's Marine Microbiology Initiative [3794]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mass production of plastics started nearly 70 years ago and the production rate is expected to double over the next two decades. While serving many applications because of their durability, stability and low cost, plastics have deleterious effects on the environment. Plastic is known to release a variety of chemicals during degradation, which has a negative impact on biota. Here, we show that the most commonly used plastics produce two greenhouse gases, methane and ethylene, when exposed to ambient solar radiation. Polyethylene, which is the most produced and discarded synthetic polymer globally, is the most prolific emitter of both gases. We demonstrate that the production of trace gases from virgin low-density polyethylene increase with time, with rates at the end of a 212-day incubation of 5.8 nmol g(-1) d(-1) of methane, 14.5 nmol g(-1) d(-1) of ethylene, 3.9 nmol g(-1) d(-1) of ethane and 9.7 nmol g(-1) d(-1) of propylene. Environmentally aged plastics incubated in water for at least 152 days also produced hydrocarbon gases. In addition, low-density polyethylene emits these gases when incubated in air at rates similar to 2 times and similar to 76 times higher than when incubated in water for methane and ethylene, respectively. Our results show that plastics represent a heretofore unrecognized source of climate-relevant trace gases that are expected to increase as more plastic is produced and accumulated in the environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available