4.6 Review

Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186287

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Advanced maternal age (AMA; >= 35 years) is an increasing trend and is reported to be associated with various pregnancy complications. Objective To determine the risk of stillbirth and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in women of AMA. Search strategy Embase, Medline (Ovid), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, ClinicalTrials. gov, LILACS and conference proceedings were searched from >= 2000. Selection criteria Cohort and case-control studies reporting data on one or more co-primary outcomes (stillbirth or fetal growth restriction (FGR)) and/or secondary outcomes in mothers >= 35 years and <35 years. Data collection and analysis The effect of age on pregnancy outcome was investigated by random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression. Stillbirth rates were correlated to rates of maternal diabetes, obesity, hypertension and use of assisted reproductive therapies (ART). Main results Out of 1940 identified titles; 63 cohort studies and 12 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. AMA increased the risk of stillbirth (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.62 to 1.89) with a population attributable risk of 4.7%. Similar trends were seen for risks of FGR, neonatal death, NICU unit admission restriction and GDM. The relationship between AMA and stillbirth was not related to maternal morbidity or ART. Conclusions Stillbirth risk increases with increasing maternal age. This is not wholly explained by maternal co-morbidities and use of ART. We propose that placental dysfunction may mediate adverse pregnancy outcome in AMA. Further prospective studies are needed to directly test this hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available