4.6 Article

Ocular biometric measurements in cataract surgery candidates in Portugal

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184837

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Portuguese research Grant through FCT-MEC [PEst-OE/FIS/UI0068/2011, UID/FIS/00068/2013]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, Portugal
  3. Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia PhD Grant
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PEst-OE/FIS/UI0068/2011, UID/FIS/00068/2013]
  5. Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/FIS/00068/2013] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Describe the ocular biometric parameters and their associations in a population of cataract surgery candidates. Methods A cross-sectional study of 13,012 eyes of 6,506 patients was performed. Biometric parameters of the eyes were measured by optical low-coherence reflectometry. The axial length (AL), mean keratometry (K) and astigmatism, anterior chamber depth (ACD) (epithelium to lens), lens thickness (LT), and Corneal Diameter (CD) were evaluated. Results The mean age was 69 +/- 10 years (44-99 years). Mean AL, Km, and ACD were 23.87 +/- 1.55 mm (19.8-31.92 mm), 43.91 +/- 1.71 D (40.61-51.14 D), and 3.25 +/- 0.44 mm (2.04-5.28 mm), respectively. The mean LT was 4.32 +/- 0.49 mm (2.73-5.77 mm) and the mean CD was 12.02 +/- 0.46 mm (10.50-14.15 mm). The mean corneal astigmatism was 1.08 +/- 0.84 D (0.00-7.58 D) and 43.5% of eyes had astigmatism >= 1.00 D. Male patients had longer AL and ACDs (p <.001) and flatter corneas (p <.001). In regression models considering age, gender, Km, ACD, LT, and CD, a longer AL was associated with being male and having higher ACD, LT and CD. Conclusions These data represent normative biometric values for the Portuguese population. The greatest predictor of ocular biometrics was gender. There was no significant correlation between age and AL, ACD, or Km. These results may be relevant in the evaluation of refractive error and in the calculation of intraocular lens power.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available