4.6 Article

IFNGR1 signaling is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes during infection with malaria parasites

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185392

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15K08451, 15K08449, 15K19085]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K08449, 15K19085, 15K08451] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Complicated/severe cases of placental pathology due to Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax, especially adverse pregnancy outcomes during P. vivax infection, have been increasing in recent years. However, the pathogenesis of placental pathology during severe malaria is poorly understood, while responses against IFN-y are thought to be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. In the present study, we explored the role of IFN-gamma receptor 1 (IFNGR1) signaling in placental pathology during severe malaria using luciferase-expressing rodent malaria parasites, P. berghei NK65 (PbNK65L). We detected luciferase activities in the lung, spleen, adipose tissue, and placenta in pregnant mice, suggesting that infected erythrocytes could accumulate in various organs during infection. Importantly, we found that fetal mortality in IFNGR1-deficient mice infected with PbNK65L parasites was much less than in infected wild type (WT) mice. Placental pathology was also improved in IFNGR1deficient mice. In contrast, bioluminescence imaging showed that parasite accumulation in the placentas of IFNGR1-deficient pregnant mice was comparable to that in WT mice infected with PbNK65L. These findings suggest that IFNGR1 signaling plays a pivotal role in placental pathology and subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes during severe malaria. Our findings may increase our understanding of how disease aggravation occurs during malaria during pregnancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available