4.6 Article

The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IPBES
  2. CONICET
  3. Universidad Nacional de Cordoba
  4. FONCyT
  5. Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI)
  6. Addis Ababa University
  7. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
  8. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
  9. Government of Japan
  10. Government of South Africa
  11. Government of United Kingdom
  12. ICSU (International Council for Science)
  13. International Human Dimensions Programme for global change research (IHDP)
  14. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
  15. DIVERSITAS
  16. US National Science Foundation
  17. Directorate For Geosciences [1138881, GRANTS:13680033] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The first public product of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) is its Conceptual Framework. This conceptual and analytical tool, presented here in detail, will underpin all IPBES functions and provide structure and comparability to the syntheses that IPBES will produce at different spatial scales, on different themes, and in different regions. Salient innovative aspects of the IPBES Conceptual Framework are its transparent and participatory construction process and its explicit consideration of diverse scientific disciplines, stakeholders, and knowledge systems, including indigenous and local knowledge. Because the focus on co-construction of integrative knowledge is shared by an increasing number of initiatives worldwide, this framework should be useful beyond IPBES, for the wider research and knowledge-policy communities working on the links between nature and people, such as natural, social and engineering scientists, policy-makers at different levels, and decision-makers in different sectors of society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available