4.6 Article

Directional preference in dogs: Laterality and pull of the north

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185243

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [15-21840S]
  2. Grant Agency of the Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, CIGA [20174319]
  3. Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, IGA [B07/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laterality is a well described phenomenon in domestic dogs. It was shown that dogs, under calm Earth's magnetic field conditions, when marking their home ranges, tend to head about north- or southwards and display thus magnetic alignment. The question arises whether magnetic alignment might be affected or even compromised by laterality and vice versa. We tested the preference of dogs to choose between two dishes with snacks that were placed left and right, in different compass directions (north and east, east and south, south and west or west and north) in front of them. Some dogs were right- lateral, some left- lateral but most of them were ambilateral. There was a preference for the dish placed north compared to the one placed east of the dog (pull of the north). This effect was highly significant in small and medium- sized breeds but not in larger breeds, highly significant in females, in older dogs, in lateralized dogs but less significant or not significant in males, younger dogs, or ambilateral dogs. Laterality and pull of the north are phenomena which should be considered in diverse tasks and behavioral tests with which dogs or other animals might be confronted. The interaction and possible conflict between lateralization and pull of the northmight be also considered as a reason for shifted magnetic alignment observed in different animal species in different contexts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available