4.6 Article

The density of parasympathetic axons is reduced in the exocrine pancreas of individuals recently diagnosed with type 1 diabetes

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179911

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
  2. Novo Nordisk Foundation, through the PEVNET Study Group
  3. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme [FP7] [261441 PEVNET]
  4. Barndiabetesfonden (Swedish Child Diabetes Foundation)
  5. Swedish Medical Research Council [65X-12219-15-6, K2015-54X-12219-19-4, 2008-4216, 521-2012-2119]
  6. Diabetes Wellness Sweden
  7. Swedish Diabetes Foundation
  8. Family Ernfors Fund
  9. Magnus Bergvalls Stiftelse
  10. Gillbergska stiftelsen
  11. Tore Nilsson Fund for Medical Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To elucidate the etiology of type 1 diabetes, the affected pancreas needs to be thoroughly characterized. Pancreatic innervation has been suggested to be involved in the pathology of the disease and a reduction of sympathetic innervation of the islets was recently reported. In the present study, we hypothesized that parasympathetic innervation would be altered in the type 1 diabetes pancreas. Human pancreatic specimens were obtained from a unique cohort of individuals with recent onset or long standing type 1 diabetes. Density of parasympathetic axons was assessed by immunofluorescence and morphometry. Our main finding was a reduced density of parasympathetic axons in the exocrine, but not endocrine compartment of the pancreas in individuals with recent onset type 1 diabetes. The reduced density of parasympathetic axons in the exocrine compartment could have functional implications, e.g. be related to the exocrine insufficiency reported in type 1 diabetes patients. Further studies are needed to understand whether reduced parasympathetic innervation is a cause or consequence of type 1 diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available