4.8 Article

Redox reaction induced Ostwald ripening for size- and shape-focusing of palladium nanocrystals

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 6, Issue 9, Pages 5197-5203

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5sc01787d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U. S. National Science Foundation [CHE-1308587]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21403160, 21471123]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities by Xi'an Jiaotong University
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1308587] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Chemistry [1308587] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report here that size- and shape-focusing can be achieved through the well-known Ostwald ripening process to produce high-quality metal nanocrystals (NCs). Using Pd as an example, we show that the addition of small NCs of appropriate sizes could help in modulating the growth of larger NCs and enable excellent control over both the size and shape uniformity of the products. A detailed mechanistic study showed that the self-focusing of Pd NCs relied on a dissolution and regrowth process induced by redox reaction of HCHO. With the assistance of HCHO, injection of small sacrificial nanocrystals (SNCs), with sizes below a critical value, into larger seeds results in the dissolution of the SNCs and subsequent deposition onto the larger ones, thus allowing the formation of monodisperse Pd NCs. We have identified the critical radius of the SNCs to be similar to 5.7 nm for Pd, and verified that SNCs with sizes larger than that could not effectively support the growth of larger seeds. More interestingly, since Ostwald ripening involves matter relocation, this synthetic approach could even break the self-termination growth habits of metal NCs and produce nanocrystals with sizes that are not conveniently accessible by direct growth.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available